Lessons from Samsung’s defeat to Apple: Will it repeat Nokia’s mistakes?

Lessons from Samsung’s defeat to Apple: Will it repeat Nokia’s mistakes?

On August 1, according to a report from BI Chinese website, Samsung released a worrying quarterly financial report. Samsung's operating profit has declined for the third consecutive quarter. This time, Samsung's operating profit fell by 25% year-on-year. Samsung's performance was mainly dragged down by its mobile business, whose profit fell by 30% year-on-year.

However, Apple's operating profit increased by 12% during the same period. Apple does not disclose the operating profit of its iPhone business, but data shows that iPhone sales increased by 9%.

Worse still, Samsung's smartphone market share fell to 25.2% in the second quarter, from 32.5% in the same period last year. Apple's market share also fell, but to a lesser extent, from 13.4% to 11.9%. Reuters reported: "Samsung was the only major mobile phone manufacturer to report a decline in shipments in the second quarter."

The competition between Samsung and Apple is also known as the first battle of smartphones. Samsung did launch a fierce attack on Apple. When Samsung was at its peak, some people said that Apple would be defeated by Samsung and Android. At present, judging from the data, Apple has won and Samsung has lost.

Although Apple CEO Cook has been criticized, he often says "do the right thing". One of our students is the chairman of a domestic kitchen appliance company. He has worked under Cook for many years. What impressed him most was that Cook would ask several questions in a row for all questions, and many executives were often stumped by his questions.

Regarding this PK battle between Apple and Samsung, I also want to ask: Why?

1. Samsung’s biggest lesson is the lack of clarity in product categories. Samsung launched two battles simultaneously, and both of these battles were basically defeated.

Samsung has two battle lines: one is the high-end mobile phone product line, which is priced similarly to Apple. In the high-end price range, there are basically three factors to compete on: brand and style; craftsmanship; and software experience. Samsung is relatively strong in terms of brand, relying on advertising, but it is relatively weak in terms of style. In terms of craftsmanship and software experience, it is completely defeated.

Samsung's other battlefront is low-end mobile phones, which basically compete on three points: performance, price, and software experience. Samsung has encountered strong resistance from Chinese mobile phone manufacturers in the field of low-end mobile phones. Samsung has not achieved perfection in low-end mobile phones. Samsung's performance is good, but it is also far behind in terms of price and software experience.

Apple actually has its own low-end mobile phone strategy, which is to sell old Apple phones at very low prices. For example, the Apple iPhone 4 sells for more than 2,000 yuan.

2. Samsung's second lesson is also a big pit that many domestic mobile phones may face, that is, there are sales but no users. I once heard a Samsung executive say that they sell so many mobile phones a year, but they don't know who the users are. This is the most terrifying thing. Without user data, it is difficult to have a fan system, and without fans, there is no future.

3. Samsung's third lesson is its inaction on software, or it has not made the right choice. Samsung currently has two choices: one is to customize its own system (Tizen), which not only avoids the Android licensing fee, but also tailors software for its own hardware, such as the Gear watch, with a simple system and market differentiation. The other is to optimize its own operating system based on the Android platform, just like MIUI, which can also get more support by listening to the voice of users based on its own creativity. But at present, Samsung wants to launch its own Tizen Alliance, but it has repeatedly postponed the release.

Samsung's lessons have basically been learned from Nokia. Judging from the current situation, Samsung is basically running wildly along the same path that Nokia once walked through.

As a winner of Toutiao's Qingyun Plan and Baijiahao's Bai+ Plan, the 2019 Baidu Digital Author of the Year, the Baijiahao's Most Popular Author in the Technology Field, the 2019 Sogou Technology and Culture Author, and the 2021 Baijiahao Quarterly Influential Creator, he has won many awards, including the 2013 Sohu Best Industry Media Person, the 2015 China New Media Entrepreneurship Competition Beijing Third Place, the 2015 Guangmang Experience Award, the 2015 China New Media Entrepreneurship Competition Finals Third Place, and the 2018 Baidu Dynamic Annual Powerful Celebrity.

<<:  The money-burning model of video websites "joining hands" with film and television companies is unsustainable

>>:  Product application fragmentation increases the difficulty of color TV Internetization

Recommend

The beginning and end of whether the flow is cleared or not

[[150390]] On October 1, the three telecom operat...

What kind of magic is used to turn "silicon" into "solar cell"?

Produced by: Science Popularization China Produce...

The slowest flying aircraft? Uncovering the art of F1D's extreme slow flying

F1 pursues speed, but do you know what F1D pursue...

Tik Tok’s monetization and commercialization trends!

For commercial products, monetization is an unavo...

WeChat group fission practice: fission 1,000 groups within 30 days!

Starting last year, the term "private domain...

Lao Duan talks about OTT: Things about multi-screen interaction

Duan Youqiao, an artist of iQiyi. From an Interne...

The core of brand planning and promotion!

The names, logos, standard colors and standard ch...

The iPhone SE is aimed at users who have never used a smartphone.

Yesterday, Apple released the iPhone SE at its pr...

Data analysis practice: If I do data analysis for shared bicycle products

Many people are asking: How to improve data analy...