The EU plans to promote universal mobile phone chargers. Will Apple and Android charging interfaces be unified?

The EU plans to promote universal mobile phone chargers. Will Apple and Android charging interfaces be unified?

According to foreign media reports, despite Apple's strong opposition, the European Union is pushing forward a plan to require all manufacturers to use the same smartphone charger, at least within the EU. This plan will have a significant impact on Apple and its users.

The European Parliament has voted to establish a unified charging standard for mobile devices, with the European Commission's plan centered on hopes of making things easier for consumers and radically reducing the amount of electronic waste created by discarded chargers.

In the European Commission's "Impact Assessment Study on Common Chargers for Portable Devices", 15% to 20% of respondents said they encountered "significant problems" due to using non-standard chargers. These included incompatibility of available chargers, certain devices and chargers charging too slowly, and carrying different types of chargers taking up too much space.

[[313783]]

Figure 1: The European Commission plans to introduce a universal charger standard

In 2009, a number of suppliers, including Apple, Samsung and Nokia, signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" which reads: "The signatories agree to develop a common specification based on the USB 2.0 micro-B connector, which allows mobile phones to be compatible with all chargers. For those mobile phones that do not have a USB micro-B connector, the Memorandum of Understanding allows the use of adapters."

The 2009 MoU expired in 2014, and although the smartphone industry proposed a new MoU in 2018, the European Commission rejected the request because USB-C had become more common by then. However, the focus of the 2009 Common Specification lies in the wording regarding adapters.

To comply with the EU agreement, Apple introduced a Lightning to micro USB adapter in 2012. The adapter was launched in Europe at the same time as the iPhone 5, but had mixed results.

Figure 2: Apple introduced the Lightning to micro USB adapter specifically to comply with the 2009 EU agreement

The 2009 MoU was a success if you don’t mind vendors continuing to roll out proprietary cables and adapters. But the European Commission said in its assessment that the MoU had in fact failed, as it was intended to reduce the number of chargers needed and “decouple” devices so that phones no longer always had to come with their own charger.

Before the vote, Apple said in a letter to the European Commission that requiring it to abandon the Lightning connector in the transition to the new standard would actually lead to "an unprecedented increase in e-waste."

"We believe that regulation that forces a consistent type of connector inside all smartphones would stifle innovation rather than encourage it, and would harm European consumers and the economy as a whole," Apple wrote. "We hope the European Commission will continue to seek a solution that does not restrict the industry's ability to innovate and bring exciting new technologies to customers."

The European vote to standardize chargers is far from a straightforward decision to adopt any one standard and enforce it. The European Commission report makes clear that there is "no clear 'best' solution."

The report offers a variety of possible options, from allowing dedicated chargers with adapters to mandating the use of USB-C, and several scenarios in between. The changes would primarily involve standardization not of cables and connectors, but of the chargers themselves. Most phones use a power cord that plugs into a so-called "external power source."

"The most effective way to address the inconvenience caused to consumers by the continued existence of different charging solutions is to seek a solution combining a common connector and an interoperable external power source," the European Commission said in the report.

The European Parliament overwhelmingly supports some kind of standardization of chargers for smartphones and requiring other mobile devices to use the same charging method, but there is no specific timeline or plan for this plan.

Figure 3: The European Commission’s report outlines what it considers possible options

As the image above shows, option 0 actually describes the current situation, where Apple can continue to use its Lightning connector or any connector it chooses as long as an adapter is available.

Option 1 would see significant changes, as it would effectively force the iPhone to use USB-C. Apple already uses USB-C on some charging plugs and iPad Pro, so it was expected that Apple would move it to the iPhone as well. However, the company continues to stick with Lightning, seemingly because the change would affect many users. Apple has argued to the European Commission that the proposed charger changes would affect all the countless docks and other third-party devices that connect via Lightning.

Option 2 is a compromise that requires an adapter plus a USB-C AC power plug, which is possible, but USB-C chargers are more expensive than Lightning chargers. Option 3 also means that Apple must provide a USB-C AC power plug, but the iPhone itself may continue to use the Lightning interface. Option 4 is for Apple to produce both a USB-C AC power plug and a USB-C iPhone.

Option 5 would be the most costly for Apple, as it would mean that Apple would need to launch a USB-C iPhone, along with a USB-PD-compatible fast-charging AC power plug that would provide at least 15W of power to connected devices.

The European Commission does believe wireless charging is a good solution, but it is not optimistic about its potential. "Wireless charging is a nascent technology. Currently, its energy efficiency is about 60%, while wired charging technology has an energy efficiency of nearly 100%," the agency said in the report.

Figure 4: Apple is not opposed to adopting USB-C and even promotes this standard on iPad Pro, but it is opposed to forcing the adoption of any standard

Problems like these make the EU's overall plan difficult to implement, and the range of possible options being considered means that the EU has been unable to implement any agreement since the memorandum of understanding was signed in 2009, let alone legislate.

At the heart of the issue remains Apple’s view on e-waste and stifling innovation. “We believe that further harmonization would bring greater convenience to consumers, as they would be able to charge not only their mobile phones but also other portable devices using common cables and chargers, and would have the option of keeping their existing chargers and buying their phones without chargers at a lower price,” the European Commission said in its report.

According to preliminary analysis by the European Commission, the solution is also expected to reduce the number of counterfeit chargers on the market, thereby helping to reduce e-waste.

However, the same report also specifically points out that if it succeeds in preventing phone manufacturers from always providing their own chargers, then counterfeiting will increase, leading to an increase in sales of unsafe or counterfeit chargers. At the same time, any further coordination should not restrict innovation, namely the development and promotion of new generations of chargers.

Given this, it’s not entirely clear what happens next; the only certainty seems to be that it will take a long time to roll out a universal charging standard.

<<:  On the first day of work, DingTalk and WeChat for Work both crashed

>>:  Douyin's overseas version tests a new interface and has to deal with plagiarism from rivals due to pressure

Recommend

How is the spiciness of those notoriously spicy peppers measured?

© National Institute of Standards and Technology ...

8 suggestions for advertising on Xiaohongshu!

By reviewing the 2021 520 marketing data and refe...

Year-end review: Interpretation of the top ten domestic technology news in 2021

The year of 2021, with its climaxes one after ano...

Three steps to launch the event!

Event operation is different from content operati...

Short video operation data analysis method!

In the previous sharing, we focused on the produc...

Solid info! 7 marketing tactics that small and medium-sized businesses must know

Sale! Price reduction! The annual “Double Eleven”...

SEM delivery: From entry to mastery in just 5 steps!

SEM delivery is quite simple in the early stages....