DXOMARK overturned a large-scale double standard scene: mistook the screen protector for OLED screen burn-in, and gave the same screen two ratings

DXOMARK overturned a large-scale double standard scene: mistook the screen protector for OLED screen burn-in, and gave the same screen two ratings

Recently, former OPPO vice president Shen Yiren complained about the famous evaluation organization DXOMARK on Weibo, saying that its scoring was not rigorous. Two identical mobile phone screens were measured to have two scores with huge differences.

The two screens mentioned by Shen Yiren in his Weibo post are the screens on OPPO FindX2 Pro and OnePlus 8 Pro. Both use the same screen, with no difference in model or parameters. OPPO and OnePlus are originally from the same company, so how can there be a difference of more than ten points?

DXOMARK's official Weibo account also responded, saying that the OPPO FindX2 Pro being reviewed was purchased from the French market. After standard quantitative testing, this machine happened to encounter the OLED screen burn-in phenomenon, so the score was lower than that of OnePlus 8 Pro.

However, this statement is really untenable, because DXOMARK pointed out in its review of OPPO FindX2 Pro that the uneven brightness at the top was caused by screen burn-in.

The reason why the OnePlus 8 Pro scored higher is not because it does not have this problem, but because the same problem was attributed to "uneven screen color". This is a double standard.

Moreover, DXOMARK not only failed to answer the question in the subsequent explanation, but also made things worse. They reiterated that their evaluation was conducted on a new phone purchased and after removing the protective film. However, careful netizens found that the reflection of the camera showed that they did not remove the protective film during the test, and the test with the film greatly reduced the professionalism of DXOMARK's evaluation.

In fact, because DXOMARK provides for-profit consulting services while claiming to be an independent reviewer, the neutrality of its reviews has always been questioned. For example, in the familiar mobile phone camera reviews, the scores of DXOMARK tests are now increasingly unable to reflect the camera quality of a mobile phone.

As a winner of Toutiao's Qingyun Plan and Baijiahao's Bai+ Plan, the 2019 Baidu Digital Author of the Year, the Baijiahao's Most Popular Author in the Technology Field, the 2019 Sogou Technology and Culture Author, and the 2021 Baijiahao Quarterly Influential Creator, he has won many awards, including the 2013 Sohu Best Industry Media Person, the 2015 China New Media Entrepreneurship Competition Beijing Third Place, the 2015 Guangmang Experience Award, the 2015 China New Media Entrepreneurship Competition Finals Third Place, and the 2018 Baidu Dynamic Annual Powerful Celebrity.

<<:  BYD Qin PLUS is exposed, using the classic design style, and the range breaks the 1,000-kilometer mark for the first time

>>:  The best car is still there. The global electric vehicle sales ranking for October is released, and Wuling Hongguang MINI EV ranks second

Recommend

How many "moons" can the Earth have at most?

The Earth is the only celestial body in the known...

Digital Global: How should 5G intelligence empower thousands of industries?

At present, the new generation of information and...

App brand word is “infringed”? Apple says you can do this!

The brand name of their own app was "infring...

How to create a product that users can’t put down?

Why do cheating news always dominate the screen? ...

How to improve SEM conversion rate?

Among SEM techniques, reducing conversion costs i...

Dragon Boat Festival Marketing Activities Guide!

Holidays have always been important marketing nod...

How to play "618"? Take this advertising guide for free

This year’s “618” mid-year shopping festival coin...

Don't criticize Baidu, no one is innocent

[[162080]] Recently, the Baidu selling forum even...

WeChat payment practice version

Source code introduction: Through the call of cod...