iOS developers collectively sued Apple: charging $99 per year and taking 30%

iOS developers collectively sued Apple: charging $99 per year and taking 30%

On Friday local time in the United States, iOS developers filed a class action lawsuit against Apple. The developers believed that Apple abused its monopoly power, forcibly set the lowest price, required App developers to pay $99 per year, and must give 30% of sales revenue to Apple.

The developers filed a lawsuit with the Northern California District Court, arguing that Apple used anti-competitive means to form a monopoly in the iOS App market. Apple prohibits third parties from distributing digital content, imposes mandatory requirements on developers when setting prices, and also "taxes" developers.

[[269202]]

Plaintiff Barry Sermons filed the lawsuit on behalf of App developers. He believes that due to Apple's evil deeds, the fees, costs, and pricing of Apps and products within App programs have continued to rise, and developers have no choice but to obey Apple's orders. Simmons also believes that Apple's actions have weakened the competitiveness of competitors, affected their motivation to innovate, and ultimately harmed competition.

Developers also complained that Apple flouted antitrust laws and 100% controlled the iOS App distribution market. Apple banned iPhone and iPad users from downloading software from third parties, forming a monopoly. Using its monopoly position, Apple "taxed" developers, requiring 30% of the revenue from each sale to be paid to Apple as a commission, even for purchases within the App.

"There is no compelling reason to encourage competition or any other legitimate reason for Apple to do this," the lawsuit said. "It is clear that this unnatural pricing tells us that Apple has an illegal monopoly and that it is abusing this market power with impunity."

If developers want to sell products through the App Store, they must pay an annual fee of $99. In 2017, Apple revised the "App Store Guidelines", which actually requires developers to create a new account for each client app and pay $99 per year. In addition, Apple forces developers to price their apps at no less than 99 cents, a policy that has also made many people dissatisfied.

The plaintiffs want Apple to stop its anti-competitive behavior and pay damages and legal costs.

<<:  Sigh! Nearly 8 years after Jobs' death, Apple has lost another soul figure

>>:  Why have chips become a "pain for the Chinese people"? Experts explain the reasons behind it

Recommend

Weibo advertising creative optimization skills, placement and traffic generation

I believe most advertisers are very familiar with...

3 loops that Tik Tok uses to retain users!

This article divides the operation of Douyin into...

Is the Douyin likes task real? Will it be discovered by the system?

This article mainly introduces relevant informati...

Three ways to increase users in the second half of Internet finance!

The development of Internet finance has entered t...

ASO promotion tips: Do not abuse keywords in app titles and descriptions

App Store Optimization (ASO) is a set of techniqu...

Guike Zhihu live streaming camp, 0 basics to help you earn 20,000 a month

Guike Zhihu Sales Practice Camp will help you ear...

Using this method, promotion costs can be reduced by 50%!

When doing marketing promotion or researching use...

Why are Thai advertisements so popular around the world?

In recent years, Thailand's advertising indus...

How to innovate brand marketing methods?

As a highly forward-looking content in the field ...

How to establish a data analysis logic system for information flow advertising?

I believe everyone is familiar with information f...

Observation on content products of e-commerce operation platform!

With the rise of short video platforms, the trend...

Complete operation and promotion plan steps!

Operations are basically a process of constantly ...

Strategic Starting Point-Is your strategy losing at the starting line?

Strategic Starting Point - Has your strategy lost...

What is so great about Uber’s operational strategy?

Author's note: UBER's way of playing is w...