Some Android OEM manufacturers' phones frequently kill background apps, which may even violate Google's policies. Google now wants to know who these OEMs are.
Most Android apps may not need to run in the background all the time, but there is a category of apps that do. For example, some health-centric apps may need to run all the time, but the system may not always let these apps run. Of course, having apps running in the background all the time doesn’t come without a cost, which generally affects battery life. That’s why platforms, including Android, set rules and restrictions on which apps can run in the background all the time. Google has also set rules for OEMs to be transparent about apps they kill in the background. However, some OEMs implement their own background-killing policies on top of Android, but usually don't let developers, let alone users, know about them. Simply put, some apps, such as sleep monitoring and exercise tracking apps, work fine on one brand of phone, but may not work properly on another brand, which frequently kills apps running in the background. Some OEMs also set up a whitelist that allows apps like Facebook and WhatsApp to run unrestricted, putting smaller app developers at a disadvantage. Google is well aware of these shady practices, and while it hasn’t taken decisive action, it is now inviting developer feedback for possible solutions. Back in 2018, an issue was created on the AOSP bug tracker detailing how a subset of Chinese OEMs were abusing Android’s core functionality to prohibit third-party apps from running in the background. The issue was filled with responses from hundreds of app developers, echoing similar experiences and urging Google to stop OEMs from violating Android’s compliance and implementing such an aggressive background-killing policy. On June 8, a user commented that OEMs such as Xiaomi and OnePlus even killed AccessibilityService. In response, a Google employee recently commented that they will study the issue and invite app developers to submit their feedback. Google requires developers to provide the following details:
Considering that this situation has been going on for years, this investigation is really long overdue. Better late than never, as they say. |
<<: 32-bit is dead. What does this mean for Android and Apple?
>>: After being banned for 3 years, WeChat’s important “feature” may return!
Recently, through the announcement of Xiaomi'...
Realize user self-propagation? Why should users t...
Information flow advertising is the new darling o...
Foodie Cloud: Those who run on the ground are not...
In recent years, due to the use of ternary batter...
In many superhero and science fiction movies, air...
Case Description: I made this website myself. Aft...
Recently, the drug-hunting squirrel has become a ...
[[134797]] Apple's WWDC 2015 Global Developer...
1. The market size of the wedding photography ind...
Which method do you use to extract text from imag...
Recently, Ms. Ding, who is over 70 years old, fro...
I have been engaged in Internet product fields fo...
With the relaxation of the two-child policy and t...
Google Search has more than 80% market share in t...