Is South Korea's room-temperature superconductivity research result true? An article to understand where the replication experiment is stuck

Is South Korea's room-temperature superconductivity research result true? An article to understand where the replication experiment is stuck

On July 22, a South Korean research team uploaded a paper on the arXiv platform, claiming to have discovered a room-temperature superconductor called LK-99, which attracted worldwide attention. It should be noted that arXiv is a website that collects preprints of papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, biology and mathematical economics. The articles posted on it cannot be called "official publications" because the articles posted on it are posted by the authors themselves, with the purpose of claiming their first publication rights and communicating with others, but the authenticity of the content of the articles does not need to be strictly reviewed by peers. "Officially published" articles must be able to withstand peer review. However, recently, due to the excessive pressure from public opinion, the South Korean team has removed the paper.

What is a superconductor?

Superconductivity is a macroscopic thermodynamic phase transition of electrons inside a material. Superconductors have two independent characteristics: absolute zero resistance and complete diamagnetism.

Zero resistance means that resistance disappears completely, which is easy to understand. So what is complete anti-magnetism?

In physics, the magnetism of materials is usually divided into paramagnetism, diamagnetic and ferromagnetism. Ferromagnetic materials are materials that are placed in a magnetic field or lowered to below a certain temperature. The materials are magnetized, generating a strong magnetic field and having clear magnetic poles. For example, some materials containing elements such as iron, cobalt and nickel can retain ferromagnetism after magnetization. Paramagnetic materials are materials that are placed in a magnetic field. The materials are magnetized to generate a smaller magnetic field with the same direction as the original magnetic field and a size proportional to the original magnetic field, but it will disappear after the external magnetic field is removed. Diamagnetic materials are materials that are placed in a magnetic field. The magnetic field generated inside the material is opposite to the direction of the original magnetic field, which will weaken the total magnetic field. Generally speaking, ferromagnetic materials placed in a magnetic field will be attracted by the original magnetic field, while diamagnetic materials will be repelled by the original magnetic field.

But in many cases, people ignore the diamagnetism of materials, because when the magnetic field is not very strong, the diamagnetism of the material is basically not observed. To be precise, the magnetic susceptibility of a vacuum is 0, which means it is consistent with the original magnetic field. The magnetic susceptibility of ordinary diamagnetic materials is negative, but very close to 0. For example, water, some organic matter, a small amount of metal, etc. are all ordinary diamagnetic materials. But the magnetic susceptibility of superconductors is -1, reaching the maximum value of diamagnetism, which is significantly different from ordinary diamagnetic materials and is 100% diamagnetic. Magnetic flux lines can pass through ordinary diamagnetic materials, but they cannot pass through superconductors in a completely diamagnetic state (also known as the Meissner effect). Even at a certain temperature and magnetic field, magnetic flux lines can partially penetrate superconductors, and a strong flux pinning effect will be produced. Therefore, superconductors will strongly repel external magnetic fields and can firmly bind magnetic flux lines, while ordinary diamagnetic materials only slightly repel external magnetic fields.

Regarding anti-magnetism, here is an interesting story. Andre Geim, currently a professor at the University of Manchester in the UK, is the first scholar in the world to win both the Nobel Prize in Physics and the Ig Nobel Prize in Physics. He won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2010 for discovering graphene, and he won the Ig Nobel Prize in Physics in 2000 for an experiment to suspend a frog. He placed a frog in a strong magnetic field of 16 T, and the frog was suspended in the magnetic field because frogs are organic matter containing a lot of water and have a certain degree of anti-magnetism. In fact, it is not just frogs. Because the 16 T magnetic field is so strong, a drop of water can also be suspended in the magnetic field.

Of course, if it is a superconductor of the same size, its anti-magnetism is the strongest, and only a magnetic field of about 0.5 T is needed to achieve suspension.

South Korea claims to have reproduced room-temperature superconductivity?

If you look closely at the South Korean team's magnetic levitation video, you will find that the material they originally made was a complete round pancake shape, but in order to show the phenomenon of levitation, the team deliberately smashed off a piece of the material, making one end of the material heavy and the other end light, and achieved the phenomenon of warping through uneven force. The motive for smashing the material itself is very suspicious.

If the material is made thin enough and light enough, or if a stronger NdFeB magnet is used, its anti-magnetism may allow it to be completely suspended. As expected, a recent verification video released by a domestic verification team also illustrates this point. The material made by the team is thin enough to be suspended above the magnet.

However, here is a very simple way to distinguish the suspension of ordinary diamagnetic materials from that of superconductors, which is to put the material under the magnet to see if it will levitate under the magnet. Superconductors that can achieve magnetic levitation can not only float above the magnet, but also hang under the magnet. Because the magnetic flux lines actually partially penetrate the superconductor and are strongly repelled by the superconductor, and the superconducting electrons can lock the magnetic flux lines firmly, generating a strong force, so whether floating or hanging, it is enough to overcome gravity. But ordinary diamagnetic materials cannot be suspended under the magnet at all, because the antimagnetism of this type of material is very weak, and most of the magnetic flux lines can penetrate the material without a strong force. It can be suspended above the magnet with the help of a tiny diamagnetic repulsion. If it is placed under the magnet, it will be exposed immediately, and ordinary diamagnetic materials will fall without hesitation.

Therefore, most professional research teams in China are not very enthusiastic about replicating the results of the Korean team, because it does not look like superconducting magnetic levitation at first glance. If they want to claim that they have achieved superconducting materials at room temperature and pressure, they probably need to verify whether they can levitate under a magnet at room temperature. As for the claim by a certain American company, Taiji Quantum, that it has obtained a patent for room-temperature superconductivity, it is not ruled out that it is some operational means in the capital market, which is no longer within the scope of scientific research.

In general, people still have a long way to go in the search for materials that can be used at room temperature and pressure. At present, there is no definite theory that can tell people what kind of materials can achieve superconductivity at room temperature and pressure, and even how to explain the high-temperature superconductivity phenomenon of 40 K~165 K (-233 ℃~ -108 ℃) is far from being concluded.

Although some questionable research activities have attracted people's attention at present, if more people can be attracted to synthesize and test the superconductivity of materials from more aspects, it is possible that a "black swan" will suddenly appear in the distant future. We look forward to that day.

Author: Geng Zhihao, Associate Professor of Beijing University of Chemical Technology

Review | Luo Huiqian, researcher at the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Producer | Popular Science China Central Kitchen

<<:  [Issue 17] Random Talk: "Zheli" Scientist - Chen Niannian: Dedicated to Serving the Country Throughout His Life for Nuclear Power

>>:  Help! Who said that putting garlic on watermelon can keep it fresher? Please share this with your parents!

Recommend

2019, new marketing promotion begins!

Zhihu's Liu Haoran article—— Did you know? Do...

From an i-person to an e-person, see Oppenheimer's legendary life

In the film "Oppenheimer", Oppenheimer,...

The sunglasses you wear everyday don’t work when you drive?

In summer, many people go out fully armed and wra...

Why is Jiuquan the only place for manned space launches? | Science Museum

In 2021, my country's manned spaceflight has ...

How to complete OPPO bidding within ten days?

After changing to a new job, the first task was t...

How much battery is left in a mobile phone for best charging results?

For most of us, charging our phones is something ...

Guangdiantong Delivery Case V2.0 Design Summary (Interaction)

Project Background Before the revision of Guangdi...

Woke up with a bald head? Don't worry! You just need to...

This article was reviewed by Guo Shubin, Chief Ph...

Douyin traffic and fan increase methods and operation guide!

With the advent of the 5G era, short videos are s...

All the gameplay routines of using blind boxes to create fission are here!

Everyone knows that blind boxes have been very po...